Covid remote working ‘experiment’ – where will we end up?

The remote working drive has potential far reaching
implications for not only the office space but for other property sectors too.

In the near term, more questions will be posed than answers
provided on this trend. While numerous corporate CEOs appear to be planning for
greater levels of remote working, the pace and magnitude of this trend is difficult
to determine.

Many companies have been forced to embrace remote work and
the true extent of the enthusiasm for remote work from management teams and
employees will only become evident once the Covid-19 crisis has passed and
office buildings are fully operational.

Significant enthusiasm for this concept should be expected,
given the success of remote working during the lockdown period ‘experiment’.
Asking the relevant questions to the impacts of this is important.

Recent surveys have pointed towards many companies planning
to downscale on office space.

Since the commencement of hard international lockdowns, the world has been abuzz with the talk on how this crises has changed the world and at the centre of much of the debate has been the sudden forced move to working from home, the rapid and successful adaption to online interactions with colleagues, clients and business partners and, online events and webinars.

Various employee surveys appear to confirm the popularity of remote working amongst many service sectors, saving costs and time on daily commuting.

However, a few concerns have been flagged with some pointing to human relationships between fellow employees perhaps ‘going a step backwards’ because of a lack of ‘same location’ interaction. Many people harbouring some of these concerns often agree that, while there may be a need for some time at the office, the amount of time could be significantly reduced.

While remote working is not flawless, the office work force (in large parts of the world) has become far more capable to work remotely over this crisis period, increasingly enabled by the systems and platforms that support remote work.

The pandemic has probably given the scale of working from home a massive boost for another reason; the lockdowns have contributed to a very deep recession, putting significant financial pressure on many businesses. CFOs will likely be eyeing cost cutting opportunities and reducing the amount of costly office space owned or leased.

The recently released KMPG CEO Outlook, the results of a CEO survey of 315 global corporate CEOs (including 100 from the US) points to a widespread desire to scale back on office space. Besides a widespread acceleration of digital investments, a major 68% indicated that they plan to downscale their companies’ office space.

Besides the cost reduction aspect, 72% of the CEOs saw benefit from remote working in terms of widening their talent pool. Many of us have considered a new job prospect in part based on where the job is located and commuting time.

It would be realistic to expect that, following the relative success of this forced remote working ‘experiment’ across the world, a greater portion of the office worker population of the economy will find themselves working from home – full time or part time.

This has potential major implications not only for office property landlords who are already faced with significant vacancy rates but, also for the likes of residential developers and urban planners, as many households’ location and lifestyle decisions change.

Unknown territory for the property industry for some time, there will be a lot ‘feeling the way forward’.

A few key questions around potential impacts of an
increasing remote working trend:

How fast and at what magnitude?

The first imperative question regards the timing and magnitude of the potential move to get a greater portion of the office workplace operating from home – full time or part time. Due to the lockdown, many corporates have rapidly scaled up their remote working capabilities. For many, the offices and their costly infrastructure are still standing fully functional and ready for their inhabitants to return to work, albeit in smaller numbers and in some cases, due to social distancing measures within the buildings. At what speed does the amount of office space get scaled down then? This may be influenced in part by expiring leases or when an alternative use is found for a building in some cases.

We have yet to ascertain what extent management is comfortable with employees working remotely from a simple control and working relationship point of view. It is one thing to try to adopt a positive view on something when you have no choice, but it is a different matter when you do have the choice. Once the Covid-19 pandemic has completely passed, and offices are fully operational, we will then see to what extent old management habits have changed.

In short, the pace and magnitude of the remote working drive is a major unknown for the property industry and the challenge is not to over or under expect on this change.

How far away from the office will households be prepared
to live?

If one needs to commute to the office far less frequently, the distance of the trip from home to office becomes less of an issue in deciding where to work or where to live. On average, one would expect many households to be prepared to live somewhat further away than previously the case, should they in future be required to travel to the office or to business meetings less frequently compared to previously having to do the trip almost daily.

If one needs to commute to the office far less frequently,
the distance of the trip from home to office becomes less of an issue in
deciding where to work or where to live. On average, one would expect many
households to be prepared to live somewhat further away than previously the
case, should they in future be required to travel to the office or to business
meetings less frequently compared to previously having to do the trip almost

This comfort with living further from their official place
of work would be enhanced should a greater level of remote working ease the
traffic congestion in cities too.

But again, this will all depend on the speed and magnitude of a potential future remote working trend.

Will there be a big city exodus?

Again, one must guard against over-expecting on the magnitude of any increased pace of relocation to the country towns or popular semigration destinations on the other end of the country from peoples’ work headquarters. The weak economy has placed significant financial constraints on many households.

The weekly commuting option by plane, for some from the likes of Cape Town or Durban to Gauteng for instance, could conceivably increase in popularity should it be possible for many such weekly commuters to make the trip to headquarters less frequently, perhaps only once every few weeks for important business interactions.

But weekly commuting by aircraft is and will remain for the affluent few. It remains costly. In addition, for many corporate employees there will likely still sudden unexpected in person interactions or client/site visits that crop up, and in such cases being a 2-hour flight away is often impractical.

Therefore, where we should expect more of an impact of remote work overtime is within a big city itself, more households over time living on average further from their office but still within the same city or metro region.

We should extend this to include a noticeable increase in popularity of living in surrounding towns perhaps a 2-hour drive from the office but not a 2-hour flight away. For Gauteng commuters, Potchefstroom springs to mind as one example, a sizeable town with amenities such as retail, schools, a university and medical facilities that many working households would want, and around an hour-and-a-half drive away from Joburg.

But there is one further factor to consider when formulating one’s expectations on this. Household desire to leave the city for quieter and less congested towns depends on cities remaining as they are. But if the remote work experiment is a rousing success and goes far to alleviating the dreaded congestion on the roads over time, and our daily involvement therein, then perhaps city suburban living will be more appealing after all. So nothing is cut and dried.

Has space become more important for households?

In what ways could space have become more important?

Firstly, lockdown cannot have been nearly as pleasant for those households living in apartments or small cluster houses as it was for those with free standing full title homes with gardens. Does the memory of lockdown lead to a longer-term desire by many to move to a more spacious premises? Possibly, but only time will tell.

Secondly, and strongly linked to remote work, is the likelihood that many of us may spend far more time in our homes in future, if remote working takes off as many expect. No longer will the home be a mere place to spend a few “off duty” hours, but a far greater portion of our waking hours too. The home then becomes far more important to our quality of life, and for many who have the financial means, a more spacious home with suitable workspace may become a priority.

It would also appear that, as we emerge from hard lockdown and Covid-19 pandemic fears, a portion of households across the world is focusing more on health and well-being, which includes exercise and the outdoors. Bicycle shops and manufacturers the world over have been pointing to a major bike sales boom during and after lockdown, partly to avoid using public transport in developed countries, but seemingly also for recreational purposes. Should this trend last, it points to a greater value placed on safe and well-kept open public recreational spaces and roads.

For those who can afford it, this may point to some renewed popularity in larger homes and homes located near to such safe outdoor recreational amenities.

But what then of high density living near to major business nodes?

A further question stems from whether there is any potential ‘losers’ from any future remote working trend? The obvious one at risk is office property, with a likely drop in demand for such space, and office landlords will be required to ‘get creative’ with their buildings. Inner cities have perhaps shown us a way, with significant repurposing of unused office space into high density (often affordable) residential property.

However, in tandem with the question around office space we would need to ask the same question regarding high density residential property near major office nodes.

One of the key selling points for especially higher end high density residential living is being close to place of work and avoiding a lengthy daily commute through heavy traffic.

So, if there is far less daily commuting, less people physically working in major office nodes, and less traffic congestion, how does this impact on the popularity of, and demand for, high density residential living?

The guess is that more affordable residential living units will remain in demand, but possibly less sure of higher end high density living. Does a portion of its demand shift to more spacious homes in the more far flung suburbs with their relative spaciousness?

The property development sector will likely have to grapple with this question too.

And hospitality and conferencing property?

There is also the question as to the future performance of the hotel and conferencing property sector. Remote work not only has the potential to reduce the demand for office space. The effective use of video meeting/conferencing technology for daily meetings as well as online events also places a portion of the need for regular business travel at risk. While we shouldn’t see corporate business travel being totally abolished, a sizeable portion of travel and events budgets could be expected to be cut away in what is a tough economic and financial period, aided by the success of the forced video conferencing and events ‘experiment’.

Therefore, while we should ultimately expect leisure tourism demand for the hospitality sector’s services to return (albeit battling a bit in the near term due to lingering Covid-19 concerns and tight household finances), a significant portion of business travel and events may not return that easily.

This places some potential challenges on hoteliers and
conferencing facilities.

Much depends on the extent to which company employees and managers have truly embraced the online meeting, conferencing, and webinar services available, or have they merely embraced it temporarily until the Covid-19 Crisis is past?

Lastly, do many company offices decentralize further too?

In the past, companies have often considered their head office locations based on what suits management, clients, or staff. Questions such as where management prefers to live or is there good transport infrastructure to and from work for their staff have likely often been asked.

Central Business Districts and major de-centralised nodes have typically been the places around which transport planners have planned and rolled out infrastructure. These nodes have attracted businesses in greater numbers, while the need to be physically close to associated businesses and clients also led to companies conglomerating around major nodes. If far more business activity takes place remotely, does this lead to increased decentralisation of companies too, not only to city decentralized nodes but even to smaller towns for lifestyle purposes? The potential exists for well-run municipalities and “lifestyle” towns to compete for a portion of this business.

By John Loos, Property Strategist, FNB Commercial Property Finance.

Source: |

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.